I hate Schweser with a passion more and more.
Here is text form the passage:
Prior to leaving his current employer, XX, Larson contacts 25 individuals from an affinity prospect list by calling them, using public records and not XXs records, on saturday mornings from his home. Of the prospects, a list of 10 individuals had preivously been rejectd as being too small for XX, but they still meet his new firms standards. The other list of 15 individuals remained viable prsopects for XX. After learning of their status with XX< LArson sugests that all 25 prospects consider directing their busines to him and his new firm.
In soliciting the list of 10 preivously rejected prospects and the list of 15 viable parsopects, did larson violate any CFA standards?
A) no regarding both lists
B) yes rgarding both lists
C) Yes regarding only one of the lists.
What do you guys think? Wouldnt it seem like the answer is B because he wouldnt have gotten any of the names without the list from his current employer in the first place?